2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | BLS | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3210 mm |
