2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | BLS | 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3230 mm |
