2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 5 kg more than 1947 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | BLS | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |
