2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 21 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hudson |
| Model | BLS | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3160 mm |
