2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 650 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1952 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1952 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | BLS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 684 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |