2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1952 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 933 kg more than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1952 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | BLS | Beetle |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1131 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
