2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1953 Lancia Appia
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1953 Lancia Appia. (37 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1953 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 787 kg more than 1953 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Lancia Appia. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Lancia Appia.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1953 Lancia Appia | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | BLS | Appia |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 37 L |