2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1954 Chrysler Windsor
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Chrysler Windsor (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Chrysler Windsor should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 284 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Chrysler Windsor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Chrysler Windsor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1954 Chrysler Windsor | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | BLS | Windsor |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4920 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3210 mm |