2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 (276 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 840 kg more than 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136.

Because 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 has manual transmission. 1954 Mercedes-Benz W 136 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: