2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1954 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 875 kg more than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1954 Triumph 10 Break | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | BLS | 10 Break |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 760 kg |
