2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 125 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | BLS | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2940 mm |
