2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1955 Suzuki Light
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1955 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1955 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1955 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1955 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | BLS | Light |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 359 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |
