2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1956 Lotus 11
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1956 Lotus 11 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | BLS | 11 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
