2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 (276 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 846 kg more than 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196.
Because 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 has manual transmission. 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1956 Mercedes-Benz W 196 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | BLS | W 196 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 720 kg |