2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1958 Maserati 250
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Maserati 250 (268 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 890 kg more than 1958 Maserati 250.
Because 1958 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1958 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1958 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1958 Maserati 250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | BLS | 250 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2494 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 670 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |