2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1958 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 25 kg more than 1958 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | BLS | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
