2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1959 Riley 4-68
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Riley 4-68. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Riley 4-68 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1959 Riley 4-68. (63 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1959 Riley 4-68. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 543 kg more than 1959 Riley 4-68. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Riley 4-68 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Riley 4-68. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Riley 4-68. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Riley 4-68.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1959 Riley 4-68 | |
Make | Cadillac | Riley |
Model | BLS | 4-68 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |