2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air would be higher. At 3,869 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 190 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | BLS | Bel Air |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3869 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1376 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 61 L |