2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1960 Chrysler Imperial
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 725 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1960 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1960 Chrysler Imperial | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | BLS | Imperial |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3800 mm |