2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | BLS | Seven |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 29 L |