2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 735 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | BLS | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |
