2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1963 Ford Cortina

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 337 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 1963 Ford Cortina
Make Cadillac Ford
Model BLS Cortina
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 1558 cc
Horse Power 247 HP 49 HP
Torque 350 Nm 85 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1223 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1460 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 36 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]