2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1963 Lotus Seven

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac BLS 1963 Lotus Seven
Make Cadillac Lotus
Model BLS Seven
Year Released 2009 1963
Body Type Sedan Roadster
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 38 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 430 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 3360 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1100 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2240 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 29 L