2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1963 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 600 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1963 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | BLS | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1189 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2390 mm |