2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1963 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,525 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1963 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | BLS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3525 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
