2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1964 Citroen Ak 350
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 955 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1964 Citroen Ak 350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | BLS | Ak 350 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 602 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 22 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 63 L |
