2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 888 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Imp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Imp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
Make | Cadillac | Sunbeam |
Model | BLS | Imp |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 875 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 27 L |