2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | BLS | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2060 mm |
