2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 585 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | BLS | Mustang |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2786 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |