2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellett. (76 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 586 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellett. (114 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1966 Isuzu Bellett | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | BLS | Bellett |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1470 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |
