2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1966 Jensen FF
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jensen FF weights approximately 340 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jensen FF (588 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1966 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1966 Jensen FF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jensen |
| Model | BLS | FF |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 6276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 279 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 85.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |
