2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 246 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | BLS | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2164 cc |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
