2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 390 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | BLS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |