2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1969 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 235 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1969 Jaguar E-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | BLS | E-Type |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 63 L |