2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1969 Saab 99
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Saab 99 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1969 Saab 99. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1969 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 496 kg more than 1969 Saab 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Saab 99. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1969 Saab 99 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saab |
| Model | BLS | 99 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1707 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 54 L |
