2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | BLS | 280 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |