2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1970 NSU 1200
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (179 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1970 NSU 1200. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1970 NSU 1200.
Because 1970 NSU 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 NSU 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1970 NSU 1200 | |
Make | Cadillac | NSU |
Model | BLS | 1200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |