2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1972 Citroen SM
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1972 Citroen SM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | BLS | SM |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 231 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 86.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2960 mm |