2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | BLS | 140 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |