2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | BLS | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |