2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1976 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 540 kg more than 1976 TVR 3000.
Because 1976 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1976 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1976 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1976 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | BLS | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2994 cc |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 58 L |
