2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1977 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 91 kg more than 1977 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1977 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1977 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | BLS | Malibu |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3790 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |