2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1980 Lada 1200
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1980 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1980 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 615 kg more than 1980 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1980 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | BLS | 1200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 39 L |