2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 485 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | BLS | 929 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |
