2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1984 Ferrari GTO
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ferrari GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ferrari GTO would be higher. At 2,927 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Ferrari GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ferrari GTO (400 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ferrari GTO should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ferrari GTO weights approximately 195 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Ferrari GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ferrari GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ferrari GTO (496 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm). This means 1984 Ferrari GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1984 Ferrari GTO | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
| Model | BLS | GTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2927 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 496 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 70.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1830 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2350 mm |
