2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1984 Renault 5
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Renault 5 (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 665 kg more than 1984 Renault 5.
Because 1984 Renault 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Renault 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1984 Renault 5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | BLS | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 51 L |