2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1986 Lancia ECV
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 348 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1986 Lancia ECV | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | BLS | ECV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1757 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 600 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
