2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 391 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
Model | BLS | Sundance |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2211 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |