2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 710 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1987 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | BLS | Samara |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 60.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7 seconds | 17 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 43 L |
