2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1987 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1987 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | BLS | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1270 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2440 mm |
